Opinion
No. 14-36001
06-28-2018
ALINE L. MILLER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 6:14-cv-00785-TC ORDER Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon
Thomas M. Coffin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 11, 2017 Portland, Oregon Before: BYBEE and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY, District Judge.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. --------
In May 2017, following oral argument, we certified a question of state law to the Oregon Supreme Court. The Oregon Supreme Court accepted the certified question and interpreted Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.905(2) to provide that when an Oregon product liability action involves a product manufactured in a state with no statute of repose for an equivalent civil action, then the Oregon action likewise is not subject to a statute of repose. Miller v. Ford Motor Co., 363 Or. 105 (2018).
Accordingly, the district court order is AFFIRMED. We decline to address the appellant's dormant Commerce Clause argument, and instead REMAND this matter to the district court for consideration in the first instance of that and any other arguments, as appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.