From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Alltel Kentucky

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 19, 2007
254 F. App'x 539 (6th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-6606.

November 19, 2007.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Before: DAUGHTREY and COOK, Circuit Judges; and VINSON, District Judge.

The Honorable C. Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.


In this appeal, we are called upon to consider whether the district court properly entered (i) summary judgment against the plaintiff on her claim of sexually hostile work environment, and (ii) a Rule 50(a) judgment as a matter of law against the plaintiff on her claim of retaliation. Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant. Because the reasons why judgment should be entered for the defendant have been fully articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its opinions and orders dated August 24, 2006, and November 28, 2006.


Summaries of

Miller v. Alltel Kentucky

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 19, 2007
254 F. App'x 539 (6th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Miller v. Alltel Kentucky

Case Details

Full title:Kathy MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLTEL KENTUCKY, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2007

Citations

254 F. App'x 539 (6th Cir. 2007)