From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miko Bros. v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 25, 1975
363 A.2d 1044 (Conn. 1975)

Opinion

Argued November 7, 1975

Decision released November 25, 1975

Action to recover for damage to property, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to the Circuit Court in the second circuit and transferred to the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County; judgment of dismissal by the court, McGuinness, J., for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute the action, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Appeal dismissed.

J. Roger Shull, for the appellant (plaintiff).

No appearance for the appellee (defendant).


This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the plaintiff's tort complaint. The judgment is dated January 3, 1974. The record discloses that the defendant died, and his death was suggested on the record, April 16, 1973. No administrator or executor has been substituted for the deceased defendant pursuant to the provisions of 52-599 of the General Statutes. The appeal accordingly is dismissed on the authority of Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 160 Conn. 404, 407, 279 A.2d 540, and Barton v. New Haven, 74 Conn. 729, 730, 52 A. 403.


Summaries of

Miko Bros. v. Lucas

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 25, 1975
363 A.2d 1044 (Conn. 1975)
Case details for

Miko Bros. v. Lucas

Case Details

Full title:MIKO BROTHERS, INC. v. JOHN LUCAS

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 25, 1975

Citations

363 A.2d 1044 (Conn. 1975)
169 Conn. 641

Citing Cases

Schoolhouse Corporation v. Wood

Having denied the motion to substitute, we must dismiss the appeal because we cannot adjudicate an appeal in…

Cirillo v. Pratt Associates

Hayes v. Smith, 194 Conn. 52, 61, 480 A.2d 425 (1984). If no executor or administrator is substituted for the…