From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michigan Citizens for Indep. Press v. Thornburgh

U.S.
Nov 13, 1989
493 U.S. 38 (1989)

Summary

holding that agency's construction impermissibly "resulted in `an effective repeal' of part of the statute, and thereby frustrated the intent of Congress" (quoting American Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Council of Locals No. 214 v. FLRA, 798 F.2d 1525, 1529 (D.C. Cir. 1986))

Summary of this case from U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 88-1640.

Argued October 30, 1989 Decided November 13, 1989

276 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 868 F.2d 1285, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William B. Schultz argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were David C. Vladeck and Alan B. Morrison.

Deputy Solicitor General Merrill argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for the federal respondents were Acting Solicitor General Wallace, Acting Assistant Attorney General Schiffer, Michael R. Lazerwitz, and Douglas Letter. Stephen M. Shapiro, Andrew L. Frey, Kenneth S. Geller, Andrew J. Pincus, Clark M. Clifford, Robert A. Altman, and Robert P. Reznick filed a brief for respondent Detroit Free Press, Inc. John Stuart Smith, Gordon L. Lang, Corrine M. Yu, and Lawrence J. Aldrich filed a brief for respondent Detroit News, Inc.

Page 38 Paul L. Friedman, Anne D. Smith, Philip S. Anderson, and Peter G. Kumpe filed a brief for Little Rock Newspapers, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for Detroit Renaissance, Inc., et al. by Herschel P. Fink, Richard E. Zuckerman, and David B. Jaffe; for Newspaper Drivers Handlers, Teamsters Local No. 372, et al. by Gerry M. Miller; for Union Leaders representing Detroit Free Press employees by Bruce A. Miller; and for Jane Daugherty et al. by Barbara Harvey.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the American Newspaper Publishers Association by P. Cameron DeVore, Marshall J. Nelson, and W. Terry Maguire; for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations by Robert M. Weinberg, Walter Kamiat, and Laurence Gold; and for James Blanchard et al. by Richard C. Van Dusen.


The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Michigan Citizens for Indep. Press v. Thornburgh

U.S.
Nov 13, 1989
493 U.S. 38 (1989)

holding that agency's construction impermissibly "resulted in `an effective repeal' of part of the statute, and thereby frustrated the intent of Congress" (quoting American Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Council of Locals No. 214 v. FLRA, 798 F.2d 1525, 1529 (D.C. Cir. 1986))

Summary of this case from U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

declining to employ the canon that exemptions to antitrust laws should be narrowly construed to override a department's interpretation of a particular statute

Summary of this case from Ober United Travel Agency, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor

explaining an appropriate use of the maxim

Summary of this case from Shook v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority
Case details for

Michigan Citizens for Indep. Press v. Thornburgh

Case Details

Full title:MICHIGAN CITIZENS FOR AN INDEPENDENT PRESS ET AL. v . THORNBURGH, ATTORNEY…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 13, 1989

Citations

493 U.S. 38 (1989)
110 S. Ct. 398

Citing Cases

Walsh v. Brady

In a conflict over the effect of the clause on the EPA's power to grant a specific type of variance from…

U.S. v. Western Elec. Co.

See Michigan Citizens for an Indep. Press v. Thornburgh, 868 F.2d 1285 (D.C. Cir.), aff'd by an equally…