From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs. v. Tufo

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2023
217 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

Index No. 150497/14 Nos. 471 472 Nos. 2023-01217 2023-01338

06-13-2023

Michael J. Devereaux & Associates, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Tufo et al., Defendants-Respondents, John Russell et al., Defendants.

Devereaux Law Group, Northport (Michael J. Devereaux of counsel), for appellant. Stagg Wabnik Law Group LLP, Garden City (Brian A. Lacoff of counsel), for respondents.


Devereaux Law Group, Northport (Michael J. Devereaux of counsel), for appellant.

Stagg Wabnik Law Group LLP, Garden City (Brian A. Lacoff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Kapnick, J.P., Friedman, González, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Suzanne Adams, J.), entered March 6, 2023, which granted defendants John Tufo and Janice Tufo's motion to compel plaintiff to produce previously exchanged disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered March 8, 2023, which granted defendants' motion for a stay of trial pending the outcome of the motion to compel, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in compelling plaintiff to provide defendants with all previously exchanged discovery and nonprivileged legal files, even after the filing of the note of issue and certificate of rediness. The sudden death of defendants' prior counsel after years of litigation (see Michael J. Devereaux & Assoc., P.C. v Tufo, 192 A.D.3d 506 [1st Dept 2021]), and their new counsel's inability to obtain their case file, constitute unusual or unanticipated circumstances warranting the relief requested (see 22 NYCRR 202.21[d]; Wiebusch v Bethany Mem. Reform Church, 51 A.D.3d 577, 577-578 [1st Dept 2008]). Furthermore, the record shows that defendants acted promptly by securing new representation within 37 days of their prior counsel's death, that their newly retained counsel immediately sought to compel production of the previously exchanged discovery upon realizing that it was missing, and that plaintiff would not voluntarily provide the requested discovery.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs. v. Tufo

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2023
217 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs. v. Tufo

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. Devereaux & Associates, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Tufo…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2023

Citations

217 A.D.3d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 3197
191 N.Y.S.3d 43