From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs., P.C. v. Tufo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 16, 2021
192 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13344 Index No. 150497/14 Case No. 2020-00666

03-16-2021

MICHAEL J. DEVEREAUX & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. John TUFO, et al., Defendants–Respondents, John Russell, etc. et al., Defendants.

Michael J. Devereaux & Associates, P.C., New York ( Michael J. Devereaux of counsel), for appellant. Rosenblatt & McGarrity, LLP, White Plains ( Robert Rosenblatt of counsel), for respondents.


Michael J. Devereaux & Associates, P.C., New York ( Michael J. Devereaux of counsel), for appellant.

Rosenblatt & McGarrity, LLP, White Plains ( Robert Rosenblatt of counsel), for respondents.

Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered on or about January 6, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that it is entitled to the attorneys' fees and costs it seeks to recover from defendants John Tufo and Janice Tufo ( Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642 [1985] ). In an effort to establish breach of contract and account stated claims against them, plaintiff submitted evidence that it sent invoices to the Tufos that they had at least partially paid without protest. However, there are numerous issues of fact presented by the record that go to the parties' obligations and defeat plaintiff's motion as to the breach of contract claim. These include: who represented the Tufos, whether Michael Devereaux, plaintiff's principal, and defendant Sidney Baumgarten were partners, which of the two retainer agreements was effective, and whether the General Release was authorized and binding. These same factual issues regarding the parties' obligations also defeat plaintiff's motion as to the account stated claim. An "account stated can only determine the amount of indebtedness where a liability exists" ( Parsons v. Batchelor, 233 A.D. 517, 518, 253 N.Y.S. 728 [1st Dept. 1931] ).


Summaries of

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs., P.C. v. Tufo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 16, 2021
192 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs., P.C. v. Tufo

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. Devereaux & Associates, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 16, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
192 A.D.3d 506
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1507

Citing Cases

Michael J. Devereaux & Assocs. v. Tufo

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in compelling plaintiff to provide defendants with all…