From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael C. Sch. v. Rodrigues

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:20-cv-00004-JAM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00004-JAM-JDP (PS)

09-28-2021

MICHAEL C. SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. OLIVIA RODRIGUES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

ECF No. 15

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, moves for production of exculpatory evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). ECF No. 15. Although the authority cited by plaintiff governs the criminal discovery process, it is not application to this civil case. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern discovery in this case. Importantly, no party may move to compel discovery without first attempting to resolve the dispute with the other party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) (requiring the parties to meet and confer regarding discovery disputes before bringing them to the court). Additionally, in accordance with my Civil Procedures, the parties must conduct a telephonic conference with me before filing any discovery motion.

Available online by clicking the “Civil Procedures” hyperlink at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/all-judges/50231/.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for production of documents, ECF No. 15, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Michael C. Sch. v. Rodrigues

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:20-cv-00004-JAM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Michael C. Sch. v. Rodrigues

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. OLIVIA RODRIGUES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-00004-JAM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)