From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meseck v. Noworyta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

527220

03-14-2019

In the Matter of Robert MESECK, Petitioner, v. Shirley NOWORYTA, as Correction Officer at Wyoming Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Robert Meseck, Sonyea, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), respondents.


Robert Meseck, Sonyea, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), respondents.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTPetitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner requests that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Boeck v. Annucci, 165 A.D.3d 1334, 1334, 82 N.Y.S.3d 748 [2018] ). Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Cunningham v. Annucci, 166 A.D.3d 1198, 1198, 84 N.Y.S.3d 918 [2018] ; Matter of Boeck v. Annucci, 165 A.D.3d at 1334, 82 N.Y.S.3d 748 ). As the record reflects that petitioner paid filing fees of $305 and has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $305.


Summaries of

Meseck v. Noworyta

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Meseck v. Noworyta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT MESECK, Petitioner, v. SHIRLEY NOWORYTA, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 14, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 1371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
93 N.Y.S.3d 921
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1881

Citing Cases

Mirabella v. Colvin

Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be…

Mercer v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…