From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boeck v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 4, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

526271

10-04-2018

In the Matter of Carol BOECK, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

Carol Boeck, Bedford Hills, petitioner pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel, Albany), for respondents.


Carol Boeck, Bedford Hills, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel, Albany), for respondents.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner also requested to be restored to the status that she enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, she is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Ramos v. Annucci , 162 A.D.3d 1439, 1439, 75 N.Y.S.3d 920 [2018] ). Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which she is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see id. ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boeck v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 4, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Boeck v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CAROL BOECK, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 4, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 1334 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
165 A.D.3d 1334
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 6603

Citing Cases

Greene v. Annucci

We note that the loss of good time incurred as part of the penalty imposed should also be restored (seeMatter…

Albanese v. Annucci

The Attorney General further advises that the recommended loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a…