From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menna v. Radmanesh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 5, 2014
NO. CV 14-00355-R (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 14-00355-R (MAN)

11-05-2014

RICHARD MENNA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW RADMANESH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint ("Motion"), all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: November 5, 2014

/s/_________

MANUEL L. REAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Menna v. Radmanesh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 5, 2014
NO. CV 14-00355-R (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Menna v. Radmanesh

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD MENNA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW RADMANESH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 14-00355-R (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014)

Citing Cases

Cutlip v. Deutche Bank National Trust Company

In summary, Deutsche Bank's title was central to both the state court unlawful detainer and quiet title…