From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendenhall v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
No. C-11-4029 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. C-11-4029 EMC

11-15-2011

JANICE MENDENHALL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.


AMENDED ORDER RE HEARING AND

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Defendant's reply due December 7, 2011)

Defendant City and County of San Francisco's ("CCSF") motions to dismiss are currently set for hearing before the Court on November 28, 2011. Docket Nos. 9, 13. Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition, and have orally represented to the Court that they did not receive a copy of Defendants' motion. Although the proof of service appears valid, the Court will, in the interest of justice, provide pro se Plaintiffs an opportunity to respond to the motion. Accordingly, the Court hereby enters the following order:

The two motions appear identical, and the amended motion filed on October 14 merely set a new hearing date before the newly assigned judge. Accordingly, the Court will refer to the October 14 amended motion as the operative motion.

(1) Defendant's motion to dismiss shall be re-set for hearing before the Court on Friday, December 16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
(2) Plaintiffs Mendenhall and Cato shall file their opposition to Defendant's motion no later than Wednesday, November 30, 2011.
(3) Defendant shall file its reply no later than Wednesday, December 7, 2011.

For the parties' convenience, the Court attaches Defendant's amended motion to dismiss to this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

MENDENHALL et al, Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV11-04029 EMC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 15, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Janice Mendenhall

P.O. Box 24370

San Francisco, CA 94124

Mark Cato P.O. Box 24370

San Francisco, CA 94124

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Betty Lee, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Mendenhall v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
No. C-11-4029 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Mendenhall v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:JANICE MENDENHALL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

No. C-11-4029 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)