From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medina v. Sakai

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2002
25 F. App'x 634 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


25 Fed.Appx. 634 (9th Cir. 2002) Charles MEDINA; Moses Wallace; Ophero Jones; Renaldo Magbual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted SAKAI; Wesley Mun, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-17380. D.C. No. CV-99-00876-SOM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 18, 2002

Submitted Jan. 16, 2002.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding.

Before GOODWIN, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

For the reasons given by the district court in its thorough Order dated November

Page 635.

1, 2000, Granting Defendants Ted Sakai and Wesley Mun's Motion for Summary Judgment, we affirm the decision of that court.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Medina v. Sakai

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2002
25 F. App'x 634 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Medina v. Sakai

Case Details

Full title:Charles MEDINA; Moses Wallace; Ophero Jones; Renaldo Magbual…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2002

Citations

25 F. App'x 634 (9th Cir. 2002)