From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McWilliams v. Matthews

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Dec 21, 2012
38 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2011–2038DC.

2012-12-21

Dorothy McWILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Theresa MATTHEWS, Respondent.


Present: NICOLAI, P.J., LaCAVA and LaSALLE, JJ.

Appeal, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County (Raymond C. Chase, J.), entered February 25, 2011. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $548.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $2,549.46, representing damages she had allegedly sustained to her rental property. At a nonjury trial, defendant conceded that she owed plaintiff $548 for various repairs and cleaning expenses which plaintiff had incurred after defendant had vacated the premises. Following the trial, the Justice Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $548. Plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy.

Upon a review of the record, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (UJCA 1804, 1807; Ross v. Friedman, 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000];Williams v. Roper, 269 A.D.2d 125, 126 [2000] ). With respect to the issue of damages, we note that plaintiff did not submit into evidence either a paid bill or two itemized estimates to establish the reasonable value and necessity of each of the alleged repairs for which plaintiff claims defendant is liable ( seeUJCA 1804; Rodriguez v. Mitch's Transmission, 32 Misc.3d 126[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op 51225[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2011] ). As the record supports the trial court's determination, we find no reason to disturb the judgment. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

NICOLAI, P.J., LaCAVA and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McWilliams v. Matthews

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Dec 21, 2012
38 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

McWilliams v. Matthews

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy McWILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Theresa MATTHEWS, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

38 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 52415
966 N.Y.S.2d 347

Citing Cases

Sellathurai v. Systematic Control, Inc.

Where multiple services or repairs are required, in the absence of expert testimony to support a claim (cf.…

Sellathurai v. Systematic Control, Inc.

Under section 1804 of the Uniform District Court Act, "An itemized bill or invoice, receipted or marked paid,…