From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McQueen v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 31, 2018
No. 76201 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)

Opinion

No. 76201

07-31-2018

IRVIN EUGENE MCQUEEN, Petitioner, v. THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ESMERALDA; AND THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY A. WANKER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition challenges the restitution imposed and the presentence credit granted in Irvin Eugene McQueen's judgment of conviction. We conclude our intervention by way of extraordinary writ is not warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330. Claims challenging the restitution imposed and presentence credit are challenges to the validity of the judgment of conviction that must be raised on direct appeal or in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in compliance with the provisions of NRS chapter 34. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). Therefore, without reaching the merit of the claims raised, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements for filing a direct appeal, see NRAP 4(b), or for filing a postconviction petition, see NRS chapter 34. --------

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge

Irvin Eugene McQueen

Attorney General/Carson City

Nye County Clerk


Summaries of

McQueen v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 31, 2018
No. 76201 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)
Case details for

McQueen v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:IRVIN EUGENE MCQUEEN, Petitioner, v. THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 31, 2018

Citations

No. 76201 (Nev. App. Jul. 31, 2018)