From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 10, 2021
376 N.C. 900 (N.C. 2021)

Opinion

No. 432P20

03-10-2021

Wanda Campbell MCLEAN, as Administrator FOR the ESTATE OF Josephine SMITH v. Katie SPAULDING

Coy E. Brewer, Jr., Attorney at Law, For McLean, Wanda Campbell (as Adminstrator). Natasha M. Barone, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, For Spaulding, Katie. J. Scott Flowers, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, For Spaulding, Katie.


Coy E. Brewer, Jr., Attorney at Law, For McLean, Wanda Campbell (as Adminstrator).

Natasha M. Barone, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, For Spaulding, Katie.

J. Scott Flowers, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, For Spaulding, Katie.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of October 2020 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of March 2021."


Summaries of

McLean v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mar 10, 2021
376 N.C. 900 (N.C. 2021)
Case details for

McLean v. Spaulding

Case Details

Full title:Wanda Campbell MCLEAN, as Administrator FOR the ESTATE OF Josephine SMITH…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Mar 10, 2021

Citations

376 N.C. 900 (N.C. 2021)
855 S.E.2d 279

Citing Cases

Woodforest Nat'l Bank v. Edwards Bros. Malloy

Assuming, arguendo , that this minimal appeal to authority would be sufficient to satisfy Rule 28(b), it…

Foxx v. Street

Id. Finally, although Plaintiff raises some merits arguments in her reply brief, "[u]nder Rule 28(b)(6) of…