From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Ray

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Aug 29, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:07cv00409 (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:07cv00409.

August 29, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiff Quentin McLean, a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, this court has dismissed three of McLean's previous complaints for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Therefore, McLean may not proceed with this action unless he either pays the $350.00 filing fee or shows that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

See McLean v. Mr. Fleming, et al., Civil Action No. 7:98cv00731 (W.D. Va. January 13, 1999); McLean v. J. Bolling, et al., Civil Action No. 7:99cv00221 (W.D. Va. May 10, 1999); McLean v. Schillin, et al., Civil Action No. 7:99cv00318 (W.D. Va. July 20, 1999).

As McLean has neither prepaid the filing fee nor demonstrated that he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury," the court dismisses his complaint without prejudice and denies his motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

McLean alleges that the defendants failed to protect him from other inmates and guards who harassed him, destroyed his property, assaulted him, and "disorganiz[ed] his cell." He claims that as a result, he has refused showers and recreation time out of fear that the other guards will harm him. In order to raise an Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect, an inmate must show that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of serious harm. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833 (1994). To establish deliberate indifference, McLean must show that prison officials knew of and disregarded an excessive risk of harm, mere negligence as to his safety is insufficient. Id. at 838; Estelle v. Gamble, 492 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). None of McLean's conclusory allegations show that his safety was in danger at any point. Although he claims that other guards assaulted him, he provides no details in support of this allegation and does not allege that he was injured from these alleged assaults. The court finds that McLean's speculative fear is insufficient to show that he is imminent harm of serious physical injury.

The court has previously notified McLean that he may not file civil actions in this court unless he either pays the filing fee or demonstrates that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Therefore, the court will not give McLean additional time to pay the filing fee or amend his complaint.

The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and the accompanying Order to the plaintiff.


Summaries of

McLean v. Ray

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Aug 29, 2007
Civil Action No. 7:07cv00409 (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2007)
Case details for

McLean v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN McLEAN, Plaintiff, v. TRACY S. RAY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Aug 29, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:07cv00409 (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2007)

Citing Cases

Agee v. Kiser

Defendant asserts there is no genuine issue of material fact on this claim because Agee's alleged fears that…