From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 12, 1932
141 So. 706 (Ala. 1932)

Opinion

6 Div. 148.

May 12, 1932.

Pennington Tweedy, of Jasper, for petitioner.

Chas. R. Wiggings, of Jasper, for the State.

Petition of the State for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in McKinney v. State, 141 So. 705.


We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.

We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKinney v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 12, 1932
141 So. 706 (Ala. 1932)
Case details for

McKinney v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eugene McKINNEY v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 12, 1932

Citations

141 So. 706 (Ala. 1932)
141 So. 706

Citing Cases

Tennessee, A. G. Ry. v. Cardon

GARDNER, Justice. We have had frequent occasion to note the limited review of this court of the decisions of…

McKinney v. State

Reversed and remanded. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in McKinney v. State, 225 Ala. 7, 141 So. 706. The…