From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 18, 1931
135 So. 427 (Ala. 1931)

Summary

In Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation, 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427, is the following observation: "It is settled that, in the absence of a full statement of the facts in the opinion, this court will not review the Court of Appeals, where it has applied the doctrine of error without injury. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902."

Summary of this case from Tennessee, A. G. Ry. v. Cardon

Opinion

1 Div. 673.

June 18, 1931.

C. L. Hybart, of Monroeville, for petitioner.

J. D. Ratcliffe, of Monroeville, opposed.


The Court of Appeals, in disposing of the case, without stating the facts in its opinion, applied the doctrine of error without injury to the questions which the petitioner seeks to review by certiorari. It is settled that, in the absence of a full statement of the facts in the opinion, this court will not review the Court of Appeals, where it has applied the doctrine of error without injury. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 18, 1931
135 So. 427 (Ala. 1931)

In Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation, 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427, is the following observation: "It is settled that, in the absence of a full statement of the facts in the opinion, this court will not review the Court of Appeals, where it has applied the doctrine of error without injury. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902."

Summary of this case from Tennessee, A. G. Ry. v. Cardon
Case details for

Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BAUMHAUER v. LIQUID CARBONIC CORPORATION

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 18, 1931

Citations

135 So. 427 (Ala. 1931)
135 So. 427

Citing Cases

Tortomasi v. State

And our decisions are all to one effect, that under the case as here presented, there is nothing for this…

Tennessee, A. G. Ry. v. Cardon

The opinion is, as we see it, to be properly interpreted as holding that if any error intervened in relation…