From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKinney Drillng v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Apr 21, 2009
Record No. 2840-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2009)

Opinion

Record No. 2840-08-3.

April 21, 2009.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

David E. Wilson; Jordan Coyne Savits, L.L.P., on brief), for appellants.

Terry L. Armentrout; Armentrout Armentrout, P.L.C., on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judges Humphreys, Powell and Senior Judge Clements.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


McKinney Drilling Company, Inc., and its insurance carrier, Zurich American Insurance Company, appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that Michele Peterson's ongoing right ankle and knee conditions were due to a 2005 compensable accident, that arthroscopic surgery to the right knee was reasonable and necessary, that she was entitled to a MRI of the right ankle, and that she was entitled to indemnity benefits from March 12, 2007 and continuing. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Peterson v. McKinney Drilling, Inc./Keller Foundations, Inc., VWC File No. 224-52-62 (Oct. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McKinney Drillng v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Apr 21, 2009
Record No. 2840-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2009)
Case details for

McKinney Drillng v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:McKINNEY DRILLING COMPANY, INC. AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Apr 21, 2009

Citations

Record No. 2840-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2009)