From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1998
249 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


The subject preliminary conference order is nonappealable ( Bork v. City of New York, 237 A.D.2d 218). Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm the denial of the depositions appellant seeks for the reasons stated by the conference court, and affirm the denial of the further bill of particulars appellant seeks, since the matters sought have already been furnished in the original complaint against the other defendants. We have considered appellant's other claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Nardelli, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 16, 1998
249 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS McHENRY, Respondent, v. 1020 PARK AVE., INC., et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

Al-Cantara v. Tausend

Before: Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ. The preliminary conference order at issue is not…