From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bork v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 27, 1997
237 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 27, 1997.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about August 6, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, directed plaintiff, "[i]n the event that [he] decides to produce a vocational expert to testify to his inability or limited ability to be employed", to produce a copy of his vocational expert's report and to submit to an examination by defendant's vocational expert, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Before: Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Milonas and Tom, JJ.


The subject preliminary conference order is nonappealable since it was not made on notice ( see, Everitt v Health Maintenance Ctr., 86 AD2d 224). Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm, finding no improvident exercise of discretion by the motion court.


Summaries of

Bork v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 27, 1997
237 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Bork v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BORK et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 32

Citing Cases

Thorne v. Grubman

Initially, the appeal is properly taken from an appealable paper. While the original decision made on the…

McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.). The subject preliminary conference…