From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Knowles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 16, 2007
218 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-17301.

Submitted January 8, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 16, 2007.

Jack Richard McGee, lone, CA, pro se.

Michele J. Swanson, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-02661-PJH.

Before: ALARCÓN, HALL, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Jack Richard McGee, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his convictions for lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under the age of 14. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

McGee contends that the revised version of California Jury Instruction, Criminal ("CALJIC") No. 2.50.01, violated his right to due process, because it permitted the jury to find him guilty of the charged offenses based solely on a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he committed a prior sexual offense. We disagree.

The revised version of CALJIC 2.50.01 expressly instructs the jury that a preponderance of the evidence finding that McGee committed a prior sexual offense is not sufficient to prove the charged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. We therefore conclude that the California Court of Appeal's decision denying McGee's due process challenge to CALJIC 2.50.01 was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); cf. Gibson v. Ortiz, 387 F.3d 812 (9th Cir. 2004).

To the extent McGee raises uncertified issues, we construe such argument as a motion to expand the Certificate of Appealability, and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McGee v. Knowles

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 16, 2007
218 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McGee v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:Jack Richard McGEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike KNOWLES, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

218 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Soto v. Adams

Challenges to the constitutionality of the 1999 and 2002 versions of CALJIC No. 2.50.01 have been rejected by…

Moss v. Miller

Challenges to the constitutionality of the 1999 and 2002 versions of CALJIC No. 2.50.01 have been rejected by…