noting that the defendant's failure to present evidence that calibration checks of an intoxilyzer machine was relevant to defendant's claim that the State had not provided an adequate evidentiary foundation for the admission of intoxilyzer results.
Summary of this case from Hofmann v. StateNo. 293,1993.
February 3, 1994, Decided
AFFIRMED.
noting that the defendant's failure to present evidence that calibration checks of an intoxilyzer machine was relevant to defendant's claim that the State had not provided an adequate evidentiary foundation for the admission of intoxilyzer results.
Summary of this case from Hofmann v. StateFull title:McConnell v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Feb 3, 1994
See 21 Del. C. § 4177(C)(4) (breath test admissible to prove DUI). E.g., McConnell v. State, 639 A.2d 74,…
United Parcel Serv. v. Willis. Clawson v. State, 867 A.2d 187, 191 (Del. 2005) (first citing McConnell v. State, 369 A.2d 74 (Del. 1994)…