From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McConnell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 23, 2012
NO. 02-10-00459-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-10-00459-CVNO. 02-10-00460-CVNO. 02-10-00461-CV

02-23-2012

BRUCE MCCONNELL APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE


FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On January 25, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue these appeals filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

McConnell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 23, 2012
NO. 02-10-00459-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

McConnell v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE MCCONNELL APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-10-00459-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 23, 2012)