From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maysonet v. Corp. Entity of Corr. Inst. Greene

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 27, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-654 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-654

08-27-2014

CARLOS J. RIVERA MAYSONET, Plaintiff, v. CORPORATION ENTITY OF CORRECTIONAL INSTUTION GREENE, MR. F. NUNEZ, MR. KORTE, MR. BENNETT, and MR. JIN, Defendants.



Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
MEMORANDUM ORDER

Carlos J. Rivera Maysonet ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner currently confined at the State Correctional Institution at Greene ("SCI-Greene"). He initiated this prisoner civil rights action on May 20, 2014, by submitting for filing a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, along with a Complaint titled "Tort Claims Action" ("Complaint"). The Complaint (ECF No. 5) was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) filed on August 6, 2014, recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Service was made on Plaintiff, and he was informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2, he had fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed objections (ECF No. 9) on August 22, 2014. However, the Court finds that they do not undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Therefore, after reviewing the pleadings and documents in this case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommenda:ion (ECF No. 8) of Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 6, 2014, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days.

/s/_________

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge
cc: Carlos J. Rivera Maysonet

EL 5143

SCI Greene

Waynesbirg, PA 15370

(Via First Class Mail)


Summaries of

Maysonet v. Corp. Entity of Corr. Inst. Greene

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 27, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-654 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2014)
Case details for

Maysonet v. Corp. Entity of Corr. Inst. Greene

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS J. RIVERA MAYSONET, Plaintiff, v. CORPORATION ENTITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 27, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-654 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 27, 2014)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A

The definition of a final judgment on the merits is “very broad in Pennsylvania for purposes of applying res…

Gibson v. Pa. Pub. Utilities Comm'n

In forma pauperis claims barred by res judicata are properly dismissed as both frivolous and malicious under…