From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vancom-New York v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We reject the petitioner's contention that material variations existed between the bid specifications and the lowest bidder's bid, such that the acceptance of the lowest bid disadvantaged the petitioner. Whether differences between the bid specifications and the bid itself were material or substantial was for the County to decide (see, Matter of Wilson Omnibus Corp. v Fallsburg Cent. School Dist., 167 A.D.2d 803; Matter of AS Transp. Co. v County of Nassau, 154 A.D.2d 456). Further, there was a rational basis for the County to waive any irregularities in the low bidder's bid, as it was in its best interest to do so (see, Matter of Clancy-Cullen Stor. Co. v Board of Elections, 98 A.D.2d 635). Accordingly, the County properly awarded the contract to the lowest bidder.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Vancom-New York v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Vancom-New York v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VANCOM-NEW YORK, INC., Appellant, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 943

Citing Cases

In re of Hungerford Terry v. Suffolk County

Noncompliance is considered material only when it would impair the interests of the contracting public…

In Matter of Bill's Towing Serv. v. Nassau

e legal action regarding the subject lot has not been made known to this Court; however, this letter raises…