From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Torres v. N.Y. City Emp. Retire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1990
160 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 24, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.).


The findings of the Medical Board and Board of Trustees of the New York City Employees' Retirement System were neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, Matter of Drayson v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 37 A.D.2d 378, affd 32 N.Y.2d 852). The determination that petitioner, a Rikers Island correction officer, had not incurred his injuries in the actual performance of city service as required by Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-168 and was not, therefore, eligible for an accident disability retirement pension, was supported by documented evidence. A supervisor's report in addition to written statements of two witnesses established that petitioner sustained his injuries after he had completed his tour of duty, had signed out and had changed into civilian clothes. He was then injured while in the process of leaving the premises on a Correction Department bus which transported employees to and from the Rikers Island control building. The use of such transportation was not mandatory. The issue is not where the accident occurred but whether at the time of the accident petitioner was performing city service (Matter of Alessio v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 67 N.Y.2d 978). The record fails to support petitioner's contention that he was injured while performing city service.

Finally, petitioner's eligibility for workers' compensation benefits was not dispositive of his eligibility for accident retirement benefits. The language of the Workers' Compensation Law differs substantially from that of section 13-168 of the Administrative Code. Moreover, section 13-176 (c) of the Administrative Code specifically provides that a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board is not binding on the Medical Board of the New York City Employees' Retirement System in determining the eligibility of a claimant for accident disability benefits (Matter of Alessio v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., supra).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Torres v. N.Y. City Emp. Retire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 1990
160 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Torres v. N.Y. City Emp. Retire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE TORRES, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 222

Citing Cases

Matter of Cahlstadt v. Kelly

Analysis The Code requires that the accident must have occurred "while [the applicant is] actually engaged"…

Vaccarella v. Employee Retirement System

Therefore, denial of reconsideration on the ground that petitioner was no longer eligible for disability…