From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sylvester v. Mescall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1950
277 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

September 27, 1950.

Present — McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.


Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Appellants, former members of the Lackawanna Housing Authority, failed to file their oath of office as required by section 30 Pub. Off. of the Public Officers Law. By reason of this failure, their offices, as such members, became vacant. ( People ex rel. Walton v. Hicks, 173 App. Div. 338, affd. 221 N.Y. 503.) There being a vacancy in such offices, the Mayor appointed the petitioners respondents to fill those offices, and they, having filed their oaths, were required to take over the duties of the offices and receive from the appellants the books, papers, money, and property of the Authority. While a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto (pursuant to article 75 of the Civil Practice Act) is ordinarily the only action which lies to try title to public office, where, as here, the facts are not in dispute and the only question to be determined is a question of law, mandamus is the proper remedy. ( People ex rel. Howard v. Supervisors of Erie County, 42 App. Div. 510, affd. 160 N.Y. 687; Matter of Smith v. Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39; Matter of Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing Authority, 270 App. Div. 1022, affd. 297 N.Y. 911.) All concur. (The appeal is from an order directing defendants to deliver all property of the Lackawanna Municipal Housing Authority to petitioners, permitting petitioners to act as members of such Authority, and restraining defendants from acting as such.)


Summaries of

Matter of Sylvester v. Mescall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1950
277 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Sylvester v. Mescall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HENRY H. SYLVESTER et al., Respondents, against JOSEPH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Matter of Ungar v. Long Beach

True, courts generally held that the old quo warranto proceeding, now apparently included within section 63-b…

MATTER OF PANSMITH v. Williams

w York. Petitioner then asks that an order be made pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for the…