Opinion
June 30, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
An arbitration award may not be vacated unless it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically-enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power ( see, Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Empls. Assn.], 70 N.Y.2d 907; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union, 215 A.D.2d 561). The petitioner Suffolk County Water Authority (hereinafter the Authority) contends that the arbitrator's modification of an employee's sanction for disconnecting the water meter at his residence from dismissal to a one-year suspension violates public policy.
We conclude that the Supreme Court properly confirmed the arbitration award. The parties agreed to resolve disputes concerning the discipline of employees by arbitration, and the Authority failed to establish that there are public policy considerations embodied in statute or decisional law which warrant court intervention in this case ( see, Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v. City of Binghamton, 44 N.Y.2d 23; see also, De Paulo v. City of Albany, 49 N.Y.2d 994; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union, supra). Furthermore, the Authority has not shown that its own rules require dismissal as a sanction for the employee's conduct ( see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers Union, supra; cf., Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union, 239 A.D.2d 421).
O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.