From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Squillini v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner agreed to grant the arbitrator's request for an extension of time to November 17, 1995, in rendering the award. Accordingly, the petitioner's claims relating to the arbitrator's alleged misconduct in his delay in rendering the arbitration award have been waived (see, Matter of Lebow [Bogner-Seitel Realty], 55 A.D.2d 695, 696; see also, Matter of Siegel [Lewis], 40 N.Y.2d 687, 690; Matter of Stevens Co. [Rytex Corp.], 34 N.Y.2d 123, 129; Matter of Cheek v. Chubb Son, 70 A.D.2d 622). In any event, the arbitrator's actions did not constitute misconduct.

Furthermore, we find that the arbitration award, in sustaining the penalty of dismissal from employment for theft and deceit, does not violate a strong public policy and is not irrational (see, Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Empls. Assn.], 70 N.Y.2d 907; Matter of Suffolk County Water Auth. v. Local 393, 240 A.D.2d 751; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union, 243 A.D.2d 567; Matter of State Univ. v. Young, 170 A.D.2d 510, 511, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1035).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Squillini v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1998
248 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Squillini v. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL A. SQUILLINI, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

In re Tsikitas v. Nat. Ins. Co.

ing whether an arbitration award should be vacated, "[a] court cannot examine the merits of an arbitration…