From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of State Farm Insurance Co. v. McManus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the application to change venue from Kings County to Westchester County and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the application; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

The Supreme Court erred in determining that the petitioner insurance carrier was entitled to change the venue of the arbitration hearing. Pursuant to the American Arbitration Association rules, the arbitrator is to select the location of the hearing, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the arbitrator violated any of the applicable rules in selecting the location. In addition, courts are generally without power to void the determination of an arbitrator in the selection of the venue of an arbitration proceeding ( see, Matter of D.M.C. Constr. Corp. v. Nash Steel Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 855, revg 51 A.D.2d 1040, 1043, on dissenting opn of Shapiro, J., at App. Div.).

However, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in ordering a deposition and physical examination of the appellant in aid of the arbitration ( see, CPLR 3102 [c]; Hendler Murray v. Lambert, 127 A.D.2d 820; Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Wernick, 90 A.D.2d 519).

Mangano, P.J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of State Farm Insurance Co. v. McManus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of State Farm Insurance Co. v. McManus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. DAMIAN J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 599

Citing Cases

Saez v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co. (In re Application of Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.)

Additionally, it is indeed a provident exercise of discretion for the Court to order a deposition and…

Lopez v. Mannese (In re Application of Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co.)

Additionally, it is indeed a provident exercise of discretion for the Court to order a deposition and…