Summary
denying application to amend where amendment was sought to correct a deliberate falsehood
Summary of this case from IN RE HUAOpinion
May 15, 1980
Order, of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated July 9, 1979, unanimously vacated, on the law, and the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that there was no probable cause that respondent Thomas Publishing Company had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices is confirmed on the merits, without costs and without disbursements (Matter of Callaghan v State Div. of Human Rights, 72 A.D.2d 679). No opinion.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.