From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shenko Electric, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 11, 1990

Present — Boomer, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Motion to dismiss granted. Memorandum: Petitioner failed to effect personal service of the petition and notice of petition upon respondent. The mailing of process pursuant to CPLR 312-a does not effect personal service. Service is complete only when the acknowledgment of receipt in the form prescribed by CPLR 312-a (d) is mailed or returned to the sender (CPLR 312-a [b]). If the acknowledgment of receipt is not mailed or returned to the sender, the sender is required to effect personal service in another manner (CPLR 312-a [e], [f]; mem of Off of Ct Admin in support of L 1989, ch 274, 1989 McKinney's Session Laws of NY, at 2563).


Summaries of

Matter of Shenko Electric, Inc. v. Hartnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Shenko Electric, Inc. v. Hartnett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHENKO ELECTRIC, INC., Petitioner, v. THOMAS F. HARTNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 1212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Stanley Agency, Inc. v. Behind the Bench, Inc.

Service by mail is only complete when the acknowledgment of receipt in the form prescribed by CPLR 312-a (d)…

Kostelanetz & Fink, L. L. P. v. Hui Qun Zhao

Defendant, of course, is not required to sign and return the acknowledgment-of-receipt form to plaintiff.…