From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sellstrom v. City of Rye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1988
143 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 11, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court correctly concluded that the petitioner's reassignment to shift command duty was a nonreviewable, discretionary change of detail. The reassignment conformed to the job description for police lieutenant and did not involve the performance of out-of-title duties (see, Matter of Detective Endowment Assn. v Leary, 36 A.D.2d 289, affd 30 N.Y.2d 577; Matter of Greensmith v Incorporated Vil. of Centre Is., 109 A.D.2d 742). The reassignment did not result in a reduction in the petitioner's rank or compensation. Furthermore, contrary to the petitioner's contention on appeal, the reassignment was not in violation of Civil Service Law § 61 (2); § 70 or § 75. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sellstrom v. City of Rye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1988
143 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Sellstrom v. City of Rye

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS S. SELLSTROM, Appellant, v. CITY OF RYE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Alston v. Bertoni

The detectives have not been deprived of their positions as a result of the assignment, however, nor have…

Matter of Renner v. Broome County

The duties required of a security officer I are consistent with petitioner's status as a correction officer…