From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. De Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 1970
34 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

May 26, 1970


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chenango County, entered August 19, 1969, which declared petitioner entitled to possession of a parcel of real property. To maintain summary proceedings under subdivision 3 of section 713 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, commonly known as "squatter proceedings", it is essential that the occupant sought to be removed, or the person to whom the occupant has succeeded, intruded into or squatted upon the premises, in the first instance, without permission of the owner, his predecessor in title or one entitled to possession ( Stier v. President Hotel, 28 A.D.2d 795, 796; Kaufman v. Zash, 7 A.D.2d 927, 928, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 831; Walcer v. Sherman, 123 Misc. 390). Since the uncontradicted testimony demonstrates that appellants Lansing De Lee and Velma De Lee went into possession of the farm in 1950 under the terms of a contract between them and one of petitioner's predecessors in title, they were neither intruders or squatters ( Williams v. Alt, 226 N.Y. 283, 290) and the proceeding cannot be upheld. Judgment reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed, with costs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.


Summaries of

Robbins v. De Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 1970
34 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Robbins v. De Lee

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAURA D. ROBBINS, as Executrix of RICHARD M. ROBBINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 26, 1970

Citations

34 A.D.2d 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Bianci v. Shanley

notice of the revocation given to the person to be removed It is well settled law that to maintain a summary…