From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Report of the Special Grand Jury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

June 18, 1984


Appeal from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), dated April 7, 1983, and so much of a further order of the same court dated July 8, 1983, as directed that the Report of the Grand Jury Panel 3, Second Term, 1982, be filed as a public record. ¶ Order dated April 7, 1983 reversed and order dated July 8, 1983, reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and it is directed that the report be sealed. ¶ The court was correct in determining that the report in question was supported by a preponderance of the credible and legally admissible evidence presented to the Grand Jury. However, the report must be sealed because the instructions given to the Grand Jury were inadequate. It is true that a Grand Jury need not be given instructions as complete or comprehensive as a petit jury, but it must be given some statement of the law adequate to guide it (see, e.g., People v. Valles, 62 N.Y.2d 36; Matter of Special Grand Jury of County of Monroe Empanelled Feb. 14, 1978, 77 A.D.2d 199). Providing the Grand Jury with copies of CPL article 190 pursuant to CPL 190.20 (subd 5) is not sufficient where, as here, they were never given any instruction on the standard of proof to be applied in weighing the evidence (see Matter of Special Grand Jury of County of Monroe Empanelled Feb. 14, 1978, supra; Matter of Special Grand Jury Investigation in Alleged Wire Tapping Activities in Chautauqua County, 79 A.D.2d 847). Further, an Assistant District Attorney recommended to the Grand Jury that they vote to have his office prepare a report pursuant to CPL 190.85 (subd 1, par [a]), without explaining to them their options under that statute. The proper procedure, not followed here, requires that before any report is prepared, the Grand Jury vote upon whether or not a report should be issued at all, and if so, what type of report should be prepared (see Matter of September 1976 Grand Jury No. II, 75 A.D.2d 648, 649). Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Report of the Special Grand Jury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Report of the Special Grand Jury

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the REPORT OF THE SPECIAL GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1984

Citations

102 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Matter of Hynes v. Shea

The law is clear that the prosecutor must instruct the Grand Jury on the proper standard for reviewing…