From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Powers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1991
177 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 21, 1991

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant's employer suspected that claimant had misappropriated its funds and had engaged in other financial improprieties for his personal gain. When claimant could not satisfactorily explain the financial irregularities, he was permitted to submit a resignation in lieu of discharge.

After his termination and following an investigation by Federal authorities, claimant was charged with two felony counts of bribing a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201 (c) (1) (A). Subsequent to his resignation, claimant obtained employment elsewhere until August 12, 1987 when he lost that employment under nondisqualifying conditions. After filing a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, he received benefits through February 21, 1988 which were subsequently determined recoverable by the Commissioner of Labor because claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits in that he lost his employment as a result of the acts alleged in the felony charges. An Administrative Law Judge overruled the Commissioner's determination. Following the Commissioner's appeal, the Board reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision and sustained the Commissioner's determination.

We affirm. Claimant was properly disqualified from receiving benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 593 (4) because he lost his employment due to an act constituting a felony in connection with his employment. Claimant conceded that the acts which led to his indictment occurred while engaged in the employment at issue. Given that these actions were committed during the course of claimant's employment and eventually led to his felony conviction, we find a sufficient nexus between claimant's loss of employment and those actions to warrant disqualification (see, Labor Law § 593). Accordingly, inasmuch as the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record, it should be affirmed (see, Matter of Mende [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 662).

Casey, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Powers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1991
177 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Powers

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN J. POWERS, Appellant. THOMAS F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 448

Citing Cases

Cardillo v. Comm'r Labor

Here, by pleading guilty to securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud, claimant clearly…

Cardillo v. Commissioner Labor

Here, by pleading guilty to securities fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud, claimant clearly…