From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Posner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1988
136 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Summary

In Matter of Posner (136 AD2d 236, 237 [2d Dept 1988]), an attorney was suspended for five years from the practice of law for "knowingly suborning and/or attempting to suborn perjury, in that the respondent advised his clients to sign an affidavit that contained statements known by him to be false."

Summary of this case from Klin Constr. Group, Inc. v. Blue Diamond Group Corp.

Opinion

April 11, 1988

Gary Casella for petitioner. Robert J. Hecker (Richard Grayson of counsel), for respondent.


The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this court on December 14, 1961 under the name Herbert Nelson Posner. In this proceeding the Special Referee sustained two charges of misconduct alleged against the respondent. The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee, and the respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the report.

Charge one of the petition alleged that the respondent had been guilty of engaging in a gross and impermissible conflict of interest to the extreme financial prejudice of his clients.

Charge two of the petition alleged that the respondent was guilty of conduct involving fraud, deceit, dishonesty, and of knowingly suborning and/or attempting to suborn perjury, in that the respondent advised his clients to sign an affidavit that contained statements known by him to be false.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The respondent is guilty of the misconduct outlined above. The petitioner's motion to confirm the Special Referee's report is granted and the respondent's cross motion denied.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we have taken into consideration the mitigating circumstances set forth by the respondent at the hearing of this matter. Nevertheless, the respondent is guilty of serious professional misconduct. Accordingly, the respondent should be, and hereby is, suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years commencing May 15, 1988, and until further order of this court.

MOLLEN, P.J., MANGANO, THOMPSON, BROWN and SPATT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Posner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 1988
136 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

In Matter of Posner (136 AD2d 236, 237 [2d Dept 1988]), an attorney was suspended for five years from the practice of law for "knowingly suborning and/or attempting to suborn perjury, in that the respondent advised his clients to sign an affidavit that contained statements known by him to be false."

Summary of this case from Klin Constr. Group, Inc. v. Blue Diamond Group Corp.

In Matter of Posner (136 AD2d 236, 237 [2d Dept 1988]), an attorney was suspended for five years from the practice of law for "knowingly suborning and/or; tempting to suborn perjury, in that the respondent advised his clients to sign an affidavit that contained statements known by him to be false."

Summary of this case from Klin Constr. Group, Inc. v. Blue Diamond Group Corp., 2009 NY Slip Op 32788(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11/20/2009)
Case details for

Matter of Posner

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERBERT N. POSNER (Admitted as HERBERT NELSON POSNER), an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
527 N.Y.S.2d 45

Citing Cases

Posner v. Messinger

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which found that the…

Matter of Posner

Decided December 22, 1988 Appeal from (2d dept: 136 A.D.2d 236) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…