From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Novak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 25, 1993

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant, a college student, was employed full time as a baker during the summer of 1991. During August 1991, claimant's employer repeatedly asked for claimant's upcoming school schedule so that a part-time work schedule could be arranged. Finally, claimant advised the employer that she needed a full-time baker. Accordingly, the employer hired a full-time baker and had no further work for claimant. Although claimant did not explicitly state that he was quitting his job, his statement that a full-time baker was required gave rise to the reasonable inference that he did not want part-time work during the school year. Accordingly, the determination that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Schifferle [Catherwood], 33 A.D.2d 847).

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Novak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 25, 1993
190 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Novak

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KENNETH A. NOVAK, Appellant. PRESERVATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 76

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Tripi

As to the second part of the Board's decision, substantial evidence supports the ruling that claimant left…

In re the Claim of De Angelis

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board credited the employer's testimony, holding that claimant quit to make…