From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Nicoletti v. N.Y. St. Dept. of Tax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 11, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Prior, Jr., J.).


Petitioner admitted that upon receipt of the notices for payment of sales and use taxes, which were dated December 29, 1987, he "did nothing" until July 1988 when he received a collection notice from respondent. His letter requesting an administrative hearing was dated July 25, 1988 and was therefore well past the 90-day time period for requests for review provided by Tax Law § 1138 (a) (1) (see, Matter of Halperin v. Chu, 138 A.D.2d 915, lv dismissed, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 938). On October 20, 1989, approximately 22 months after the notices of payment were issued, petitioner commenced this proceeding. This exceeded the four-month Statute of Limitations provided by CPLR 217. Even if it is accepted that petitioner did not have to exhaust his administrative remedies, he still failed to timely commence the instant proceeding (see, Matter of West Mountain Corp. v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Taxation Fin., 105 A.D.2d 989, affd 64 N.Y.2d 991). Accordingly, the proceeding was properly dismissed as time barred. Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Mikoll, Levine, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Nicoletti v. N.Y. St. Dept. of Tax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Nicoletti v. N.Y. St. Dept. of Tax

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL NICOLETTI, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Voelker v. State

Finally, in May 2005, petitioner filed an administrative petition seeking reversal of the notices of…