From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Momrow v. Scaringe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 25, 1992
185 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

August 25, 1992


Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Kahn, J.).


After timely filing objections to the designating petition naming respondent Christos N. Apostle (hereinafter respondent) as the Democratic Party candidate for the office of State Senator for the 42nd Senate District, petitioner commenced this proceeding to invalidate respondent's designating petition. Respondent's answer did not raise petitioner's standing as a defense and, on the return date of the petition, respondent's counsel agreed that the sole issue to be determined was the validity of the signatures on 61 pages of the designating petition. Supreme Court ruled that respondent's designating petition lacked sufficient signatures after concluding that the subscribing witness statements' failure to include an Assembly District number on the 61 pages at issue invalidated the 879 signatures contained therein. Respondent then sought reconsideration, claiming that petitioner's application should be dismissed because she was the Party Chairperson of the Town of Colonie Democratic Party Committee and thus specifically denied standing to bring this proceeding pursuant to the language of Election Law § 16-102 (1). Supreme Court denied respondent's motion and this appeal ensued.

Supreme Court's judgment and order should be affirmed. Until such time as the recent amendments regarding the form and contents of subscribing witness statements take effect on January 1, 1993 (see, L 1992, ch 79), the law of this State requires that subscribing witness statements contain correct Assembly District information (Matter of Higby v. Mahoney, 48 N.Y.2d 15; Matter of Morris v. Hayduk, 45 N.Y.2d 793, cert denied sub nom. Anderson v. Neuberger, 439 U.S. 1129; Matter of Vari v. Hayduk, 42 N.Y.2d 980; Matter of Rutter v. Coveney, 38 N.Y.2d 993; see, Election Law § 6-132). We also find no reason to disturb the decision by Supreme Court denying respondent's belated attempt to challenge petitioner's standing based on her status as party committee chairperson.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment and order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Momrow v. Scaringe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 25, 1992
185 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Momrow v. Scaringe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELIZABETH F. MOMROW, Respondent, v. GEORGE SCARINGE et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 25, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
587 N.Y.S.2d 47

Citing Cases

Matter of Cristiano v. Otsego County Board

Blanchard failed to timely challenge the qualifications of these voters pursuant to the specific procedures…