holding that selective disenfranchisement or reenfranchisement of convicted felons is subject to rational basis review
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ARCENo. 78-859.
January 22, 1979.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 582 F. 2d 203.
holding that selective disenfranchisement or reenfranchisement of convicted felons is subject to rational basis review
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ARCEfinding no state action where Legal Aid Society which received substantial government funding made independent decision to discharge attorney
Summary of this case from McHale v. Cornell Universityupholding statutory requirement that certain state officials publicly disclose detailed information about their personal finances
Summary of this case from Snyder v. Mekhjianupholding the Texas system of disenfranchisement of convicted felons and the provisions for re-enfranchisement as not violating equal protection rights
Summary of this case from Mixon v. Commonwealthaffirming dismissal of privacy claim challenging certain financial disclosure requirements for elected state officials because "mandatory financial disclosure for elected officials is constitutional"
Summary of this case from Price v. Corzineidentifying a "right to confidentiality" and holding that balancing is necessary to weigh intrusions
Summary of this case from Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps. v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev.Full title:GRASECK v. MIDDLEMISS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 22, 1979
Weiss then argues that if a suit's termination is precluded, it would be inconsistent to require demand as a…
Taylor v. U.S. I.R.S.are both "confidentiality" and "autonomy" branches of the right to privacy, the latter of which pertains to…