From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1975
48 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

July 3, 1975

John G. Bonomi of counsel (Saul Friedberg with him on the brief), for petitioner. Peter Fleming, Jr., of counsel (John E. Sprizzo and Eliot Lauer with him on the brief; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt Mosle, attorneys), for respondent.


Respondent was admitted to practice at a term of the Appellate Division, Second Department, on June 19, 1939. On January 1, 1975, he was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of violating section 371 of title 18 of the United States Code (conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States); § 1503 (influencing or injuring officer, juror or witness); § 1623 (false declarations before grand jury or court); and § 1621 (perjury). He was sentenced to a prison term of from 20 months to 5 years.

The specific crimes of which the respondent was found guilty in the Federal court, include the crime of perjury, which respondent concedes, constitutes a felony under our Penal Law. Our inquiry need not go any further for the purposes of this application, because, in consequence of such conviction, and by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 Jud. of the Judiciary Law, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law of the State of New York at the moment of said conviction. (Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N.Y.2d 144; Matter of Levin, 24 A.D.2d 23.)

Although recognizing this fact, respondent nevertheless contends that the petition to strike his name is premature and should be denied, because he is entitled to an exhaustion of appellate remedies. He argues that to disbar him at this time would constitute a denial of his constitutional guarantee of due process. The law in this State is well settled to the contrary. (Matter of Ginsberg, supra; Matter of Frankel, 264 App. Div. 299; Matter of Fields, 28 A.D.2d 34.)

The petition to strike respondent's name from the roll of attorneys should be granted.

MARKEWICH, J.P., LUPIANO, CAPOZZOLI, LANE and NUNEZ, JJ., concur.

Respondent's name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.


Summaries of

Matter of Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 3, 1975
48 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN N. MITCHELL, an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 410 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
370 N.Y.S.2d 99

Citing Cases

United States v. Friedland

In re Mitchell, 420 U.S. 1001, 95 S.Ct. 1442, 43 L.Ed.2d 759 (1975). This action took place following the…

Matter of Sherr

Respondent concedes that he was convicted of a felony under Federal law, but argues that this offense is not…