Opinion
October 23, 1957
On the appeal of Clara Marcatante and others, order affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of the learned Justice at Special Term ( 8 Misc.2d 313).
Appellants Marcatante and others produced many sheets of the petition on which alterations had been made. Such alterations were not initialed by the signatories or by the subscribing witnesses. In order to prove that the alterations were made before the witness signed his authenticating statement, the adverse parties produced a witness who allegedly gave instructions to those distributing the petition sheets to bring them back to headquarters so that necessary changes could be made in the statement of subscribing witnesses before signing same. This proof was entirely inadequate. No testimony was given by any subscribing witness as to the circumstances surrounding the alterations or as to whether the alterations were made prior to the date of authentication appearing on the statements of the subscribing witnesses. Said witness failed to identify any particular sheet containing alterations nor did she specify the number of sheets of the petition allegedly inspected and supervised by her. This explanation was wholly inadequate ( Matter of Warsoff v. Cohen, 289 N.Y. 108). On the appeal of Corning G. McKennee, order affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of the learned Justice at Special Term ( 8 Misc.2d 313).
In our opinion there has been substantial compliance with the statute.