From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Warsoff v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1942
289 N.Y. 108 (N.Y. 1942)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1942

Decided October 8, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, SMITH, J.

Robert H. Elder for appellant.

John P. McGrath, Saul C. Cohen and Abraham J. Multer for Morton Singer, respondent.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Stanley Buchsbaum, Paxton Blair and H. Broadman Epstein of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, respondent.


The Board of Elections was justified in its ruling that, in the absence of explanation, erasures or alterations, not initialled by the notary public, and other defects appearing on the face of the petition invalidate a sufficient number of signatures to require rejection of the petition.

The order should be affirmed.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Warsoff v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1942
289 N.Y. 108 (N.Y. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Warsoff v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOUIS A. WARSOFF, Appellant, against S. HOWARD COHEN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 8, 1942

Citations

289 N.Y. 108 (N.Y. 1942)
44 N.E.2d 386

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. DeSapio

The Board of Elections, in rejecting plaintiff's petition, acted without its jurisdiction, as it cannot be…

McGahay v. Saratoga Cnty. Bd. of Elections

22 Carmody-Wait 2d § 137:53; Pataki v. Hayduk, 87 Misc.2d 1095, (Sup W76), judgment aff'd, 55 A.D.2d 861, (2d…