Opinion
February 11, 1993
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
The evidence in the record supports the conclusion that claimant quit his part-time employment as a recording studio monitor because he could not handle working that job as well as another job he held. Contrary to claimant's contention, his supervisor testified that claimant never requested a leave of absence. He also stated that work was still available for claimant had he not quit. Although claimant contends that he was discharged, this merely presented a question of credibility which was within the province of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (see, Matter of Baker [Hartnett], 147 A.D.2d 790, appeal dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 714; Matter of Weber [Catherwood], 32 A.D.2d 697). The determination that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause is therefore supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Steed [Roberts], 115 A.D.2d 166, 167; Matter of Sillan [French Tel. Cable Co. — Levine], 53 A.D.2d 719).
Weiss, P.J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.