From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kivo v. Levitt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued May 28, 1980

Decided July 1, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Beverly Gross and Steven C. Decosta for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (William J. Kogan and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice STALEY at the Appellate Division.

We agree with the court below that respondent's interpretation of section 2 (subd 2, par a) of the Retirement and Social Security Law as excluding deferred pay increases not yet paid to the retiree from the wage base for computation of pension benefits is entirely proper and must be upheld. We note, however, that we express no opinion on the question whether section 431 of the Retirement and Social Security Law would require the same result had petitioner actually received the pay increases in issue as a lump sum, for this question is not presented by the facts of this case.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Kivo v. Levitt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 1, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Kivo v. Levitt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SADIE KIVO, Appellant, v. ARTHUR LEVITT, as Administrator…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 1, 1980

Citations

50 N.Y.2d 1017 (N.Y. 1980)
431 N.Y.S.2d 684
409 N.E.2d 1359

Citing Cases

Selkin v. Regan

Petitioner urges that salary received by him during the three-year period used to calculate his pension…

McCollum v. City of New York

The determination that the petitioner was ineligible for the program was not arbitrary and capricious or…