From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kahn v. Board of Regents of University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 1938
254 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

May 11, 1938.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


Petitioner's license to practice medicine has been revoked by the Board of Regents. Petitioner is seeking a review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. The proof consisted of evidence given by female special investigators of the State Department of Education. Three investigators visited petitioner's office on separate occasions. On the occasion of each visit substantially the same procedure was followed by petitioner. He made a vaginal examination, advised the investigator that she was pregnant and that he was willing to perform an abortion, and fixed a date therefor. He received five dollars for the examination and agreed to perform the abortion in each case for the sum of one hundred dollars and ten dollars additional for the anaesthetic. The statute provides that the license to practice medicine may be revoked whenever a physician undertakes or engages "in any manner or by any ways or means whatsoever to procure or perform any criminal abortion." The acts proven and found by the Board of Regents justify a determination that that statute was violated. ( Matter of Herschman, 233 App. Div. 884.) Determination of the Board of Regents unanimously confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

See Education Law, § 1264, subd. 2, ¶ (e). — [REP.


Summaries of

Matter of Kahn v. Board of Regents of University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 1938
254 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Matter of Kahn v. Board of Regents of University

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of S. ROBERT KAHN, Petitioner, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 11, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rothenberg v. Board of Regents

There is nothing in the record in this case which justifies the conclusion that these witnesses are not…