From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Isquith v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 1955
285 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Summary

concluding that, under § 3202, "parents did not have the right to insist that the child be admitted to a particular grade or class in the public school"

Summary of this case from Kajoshaj v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Opinion

January 24, 1955.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.


Petitioner's son was born on January 12, 1949. In September, 1953, the child was admitted to afternoon kindergarten at Public School 161, Brooklyn. After the child reached the age of five on January 12, 1954, two attempts were made to have him registered for first grade at that school, but such registration was refused. This article 78 proceeding was thereafter brought to direct the board of education to register the child in the first grade, on the ground that a child of five years of age is entitled to attend public school (Education Law, § 3202, subd. 1), and a kindergarten is not within the term public school. The application was denied. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Once a kindergarten has been established, it becomes a part of the public school system, despite the fact that the maintenance of a kindergarten is discretionary with the board of education. When petitioner's child reached the age of five years, he was entitled to attend public school (Education Law, § 3202, subd. 1), but his parents did not have the right to insist that the child be admitted to a particular grade or class in the public school. After a child is admitted to a public school, the board of education has the power to provide rules and regulations for promotion from grade to grade, based not on age, but on training, knowledge and ability. ( Matter of Clark, 67 N.Y. St. Dept. Rep. 3; Matter of Barrett, 50 N.Y. St. Dept. Rep. 481.)


Summaries of

Matter of Isquith v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 24, 1955
285 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

concluding that, under § 3202, "parents did not have the right to insist that the child be admitted to a particular grade or class in the public school"

Summary of this case from Kajoshaj v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

In Isquith v. Levitt (137 N.Y.S.2d 493, aff'd 285 App. Div. 833), the board considered the child's high rate of absenteeism in kindergarten as well as the child's age in denying the child's admission to first grade.

Summary of this case from Matter of Fogel v. Goulding
Case details for

Matter of Isquith v. Levitt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SANTLEY ISQUITH, as General Guardian of AARON ISQUITH, an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Reizel, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.

Aside from the practical construction necessarily put on the ordinance by the Town Board itself (when it…

In re Winters

I do not have the authority to direct that the board of education be compelled to accept this child in first…