From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Herendeen v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1979
73 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 14, 1979

Appeal from the Monroe Supreme Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, three tenured, certified nurse teachers of the respondent Fairport Central School District, appeal the dismissal of their article 78 proceeding. This proceeding arose as the result of the abolition by respondent of these positions for the 1977-1978 school year. Petitioners Tripp and Herendeen accepted other positions with respondent at a substantially reduced salary. The dismissed petition sought reinstatement and back pay. Special Term incorrectly concluded that petitioners' failure to comply with section 3813 Educ. of the Education Law was fatal to the valid maintenance of their proceeding. Where, as here, the time requirements of section 3813 are not raised before the trial court, they are waived (Flanagan v. Board of Educ., 47 N.Y.2d 613, 617; Matter of Schlosser v. Board of Educ., 47 N.Y.2d 811). However, we agree with Special Term's finding that the evidence in the record before it conclusively establishes that respondent school district has properly created a separate and distinct tenure area for school nurse teachers (Steele v. Board of Educ., 40 N.Y.2d 456) which is of long standing and predates the employment of all three petitioners. The documentary evidence attached to their amended petition also demonstrates that petitioners, when hired, were alerted to the fact that they were entering an independent tenure area (Waiters v. Board of Educ., 46 N.Y.2d 885). Thus, there is no issue of fact requiring a hearing on the claimed violation of petitioners' tenure rights under subdivision 2 of section 2510 Educ. of the Education Law. Petitioners' other argument that the change of title was simply that and not a change of duties is similarly without merit. We recently considered the issue of whether the position of school nurse teacher and school nurse are similar and have held that they are not (Matter of Bork v. City School Dist. of City of North Tonawanda, 60 A.D.2d 13, 17, mot for lv to app den 44 N.Y.2d 647; Matter of Abdallah v. Board of Educ., 61 A.D.2d 1096, mot for lv to app den 45 N.Y.2d 710).


Summaries of

Matter of Herendeen v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1979
73 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Matter of Herendeen v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEONA HERENDEEN et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Matter of Hewel v. Board of Education of City

Nevertheless, since an examination of the record fails to reveal any prejudice to the respondents, in the…

Kilmer v. Board of Educ

As already emphasized, the record amply establishes that she specifically applied for another position, and…